COINCIDENCES?

Robert Oldershaw
1 min readApr 24, 2018

--

Discrete Scale Relativity asserts the following.

Red dwarf stars will account for about 90% of all stars, by numbers. They do. Coincidence?

White dwarf stars will make up another 9% of all stars, by numbers. They do. Coincidence?

DSR can calculate the lower limit radius of red dwarf stars from the lower limit radius of the hydrogen atom. It works. Coincidence?

DSR can calculate the range and average radii of white dwarf stars based on the radius properties of helium. It comes out right. Coincidence?

DSR can calculate the radius range and upper limit for stars based of the radius properties of excited atoms. Bingo. Coincidence?

The spin period of pulsars will typically be 5.2 x 10¹⁷ times the rotational periods of excited subatomic nuclei. This is correct. Coincidence?

The radius range of typical galaxies can be calculated using the radius range of subatomic nuclei. This correlation is observed. Coincidence?

The spin periods of galaxies can be calculated from either the spin periods of excited nuclei or pulsars. Correct. Coincidence?

The magnetic dipole moments of neutron stars can be calculated from the magnetic dipole moments of subatomic nuclei. This does work. Coincidence?

These “coincidences” are all based on the same very simple scale transformation equations that were written down in the 1980s and have not been changed or adjusted arbitrarily.

Results like this are not supposed to happen, but they do. Moreover, I have only given a sampling above.

There are many more “coincidences” to be discovered at:

--

--

No responses yet